Categories:
-
3d 96 articles
-
animations 16 articles
-
architecture 47 articles
-
blender 98 articles
-
bédé 19 articles
-
techdrawing 24 articles
-
freecad 190 articles
-
gaming 1 articles
-
idsampa 8 articles
-
inthepress 8 articles
-
linux 57 articles
-
music 1 articles
-
nativeifc 31 articles
-
opensource 267 articles
-
orange 4 articles
-
photo 16 articles
-
projects 35 articles
-
receitas 176 articles
-
saopaulo 18 articles
-
sketches 163 articles
-
talks 25 articles
-
techdrawing 24 articles
-
textes 7 articles
-
trilhas 3 articles
-
urbanoids 1 articles
-
video 47 articles
-
webdesign 7 articles
-
works 151 articles
Archives:
-
2007 22 articles
-
2008 32 articles
-
2009 66 articles
-
2010 74 articles
-
2011 74 articles
-
2012 47 articles
-
2013 31 articles
-
2014 38 articles
-
2015 28 articles
-
2016 36 articles
-
2017 41 articles
-
2018 46 articles
-
2019 59 articles
-
2020 18 articles
-
2021 20 articles
-
2022 7 articles
-
2023 25 articles
-
2024 15 articles
I very well appreciate the concept of gbXML but why can't the features
Commenting post 277: I very well appreciate the concept of gbXML but why can't the features of gbXML be included in IFC? Why should one have a separate format for energy & thermal analysis of a BIM model?
IFC2x3 has the provision of Structural Analysis Domain. Similarly, there can be a domain for energy & thermal analysis too. (www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/IFC2x3/TC1/html/)
If the Autodesk is interfering here too. May be We can interfere with IFC and add new parameters as per our requirement. I remember an FB post at this instance once shared by you, "One who controls the IFC, controls the Universe."
Read next:
Sooner, one will be able to model the exact virtual prototype of the:
Sooner, one will be able to model the exact virtual prototype of the